Where To Find The Elusive Candies Cologne

why can

Candies for Men was a cologne by Liz Claiborne that was launched in 1999. It was a popular fragrance, particularly among teenagers and young men, and was known for its fresh, fruity, and sweet scent. However, it was discontinued, and people have been unable to find it in stores. While there have been some attempts to revive or recreate the fragrance, reviews suggest that it is not the same as the original.

Characteristics Values
Name Candie's Men
Brand Candie's
Year of Launch 1999
Top Notes Watermelon, Coriander, Cardamom, Grapefruit
Middle Notes Green Leaves, Cedar
Base Notes Sandalwood, Musk, Birch, Oakmoss
Sillage 2.39/4
Longevity 3.29/5
Rating 4.24/5
Current Availability Discontinued, available on eBay, Amazon, and FragranceNet
Similar Scents Creed Millesime Imperial, Carolina Herrera Chic, Curve Connect, #Candy by DUA

shunscent

Candies for Men was discontinued

The cologne was sold exclusively at Kohl's and was later bought by the company in 2005. It is thought that Kohl's may have decided to bring it back after seeing the high prices that people were paying for old bottles. However, the re-released version was considered a cheap knock-off and a "whisper of what it once was".

Despite the discontinuation, some people are still searching for the fragrance, with one person commenting that they would give their "first-born son and left nut" to bring it back.

shunscent

It was sold exclusively at Kohl's

Candies for Men was a cologne that was sold exclusively at Kohl's. It was a popular fragrance in the late 90s and early 2000s, with many fond memories attached to it. The scent was described as fresh, fruity, and sweet, with notes of watermelon, grapefruit, coriander, and musk. However, it appears that the cologne was discontinued at some point, and people have been unable to find it in stores. There have been attempts to recreate the scent by other companies, and some similar fragrances have been suggested as alternatives.

In 2021, Liz Claiborne, the company that originally produced Candies for Men, released a new version of the cologne. However, reviews suggest that the new formulation is not the same as the original and is very faint. Some people have also mentioned that the Candies line was part of the Elizabeth Arden portfolio that Revlon took over, so it is unclear who currently owns the rights to the fragrance.

Despite the discontinuation, Candies for Men remains a beloved fragrance for many, and some people are willing to pay high prices for old bottles. It seems that the only way to obtain the original scent now is through private sellers, such as those on eBay or Amazon, or through fragrance recreation companies like Dua, which offers a clone called "#Candy."

shunscent

It was a cheap cologne

Candie's cologne was a cheap cologne. It was inexpensive and accessible to teens and young adults, and was sold at Walmart and other stores. It was marketed in magazines and on TV, and was even advertised by Carmen Electra.

The cologne was mass-produced and was not unique or special. It was a generic, synthetic fragrance with a chemical smell. It was not a high-quality fragrance, and the scent did not last long. It was a typical freshie with poor projection and longevity.

Despite this, Candie's cologne was well-loved and received many compliments. It was a signature scent for many, and some have fond memories associated with it. It was a bright, playful, and enticing fragrance.

However, the cologne was discontinued, and now, empty bottles are being sold for high prices. The new reformulated version of the cologne has received negative reviews, with people saying it is not the same and is a cheap knock-off.

shunscent

Candies for Men was a popular fragrance in the 90s and early 2000s. It was first launched in 1999 and was marketed towards younger men. The cologne was described as having a fresh, fruity, and sweet scent with notes of watermelon, coriander, cardamom, and grapefruit. It was also considered affordable and could be purchased at Walmart for $30.

The fragrance was well-received by consumers and was known to bring back memories of youth and nostalgia. It was also considered a "lady killer" and received many compliments from women. Some reviewers mentioned that they still had bottles from the 90s, while others were disappointed that the fragrance had been discontinued and was now being sold for much higher prices.

There were also mentions of a female version of the fragrance, simply called "Candies," which one reviewer described as having a "sweet and light" scent. This version also seems to have been discontinued, with one reviewer expressing disappointment that they could no longer find it.

shunscent

It is still available online, but it is expensive

Candies for Men by Candie's is still available to purchase online, however, it is now expensive. The cologne was originally sold at Walmart for $30, but now vendors are selling it on eBay for hiked-up prices. One user on Basenotes.com said that they bought a bottle for $15 at Ross stores.

The cologne was discontinued, but it seems that it has been relaunched, although it is not clear who now owns the rights to the fragrance. One user on Basenotes.com speculated that it was likely someone at Kohl's corporate HQ who noticed the high prices of old bottles on eBay and decided to bring it back. However, reviews of the relaunched fragrance are mixed, with some saying that it is "awful" and "not the same".

The Dua Brand has created a clone of the original fragrance called "#Candy", which is available for $55/oz.

Frequently asked questions

Candies cologne was discontinued. However, it has been re-released under the name Candie's Legacy Him.

Candies cologne can be found on Amazon, eBay, and FragranceNet.

Yes, there are several similar scents to Candies cologne, including Exceptional Because You Are, Curve Connect, and #Candy by Dua.

Candies cologne had top notes of watermelon, coriander, cardamom, and grapefruit, with middle notes of green leaves and cedar, and base notes of sandalwood, musk, birch, and oakmoss.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment