Fragrance Bros: Where Did They Go?

The term fragrance bros refers to a subculture of men who are passionate about fragrances and perfumes. This subculture, known as bro-culture, has evolved over the years and encompasses a broad range of behaviours and attitudes. While bro-culture can be inclusive and foster loyalty towards certain brands, it has also been criticised for its negative connotations, such as being blindly masculine or promoting soft-headed behaviour. The term fragrance bros specifically gained prominence in the online fragrance community, particularly on YouTube, where amateur fragrance reviewers like Jeremy Fragrance and Fragrance Bros gained popularity for their reviews and recommendations. However, the credibility of these reviewers has been questioned, with some accusing them of being sponsored by fragrance companies or exaggerating the success of certain fragrances.

Jeremy Fragrance vs Fragrance Bros

Jeremy Fragrance and the Fragrance Bros are both fragrance reviewers on YouTube. In 2016, there was some drama between Jeremy Fragrance and the Fragrance Bros, specifically Daver (or Davor), one of the Fragrance Bros.

Daver accused Jeremy of being sponsored by fragrance companies and having paid subscribers. While it is known that Jeremy makes money as an Amazon affiliate, he denied being sponsored or having paid subscribers. Daver's questions were considered "loaded" by some, and Jeremy responded by calling his accusers "haters" and "losers". This response led some to believe that Jeremy does not treat other reviewers with respect.

Some commenters noted that the Fragrance Bros also admit to receiving free bottles from companies and, therefore, there was no reason to go after another reviewer. Others defended Daver's initial question as fair, and some expressed disappointment in how the fragrance community handled the situation, with the discussion devolving into insults rather than civilised discussion.

The drama also brought up the topic of the "fragrance bro" or "fragbro", a term used with scorn to refer to a particular type of fragrance enthusiast. This term is associated with certain fragrances, such as Sauvage, Eros, One Million, Invictus, Bad Boy, and Aventus, which is considered the "ultimate 'bro fragrance'". The "fragrance bro" is often portrayed as someone who purchases fragrances based on projection and longevity, whether girls like it, and the "compliment factor".

The Fragrance Bro stereotype

The "Fragrance Bro" is a term used with scorn to refer to a specific type of person within the fragrance community. The term is not neatly defined, but it is often used to describe someone who is unsophisticated and uncultured yet interested in, buys, and wears fragrance. The "Fragrance Bro" is typically related to the influencer sphere, either as an influencer themselves or as an avid watcher and contributor to comment sections on social media platforms.

The "Fragrance Bro" is a twist on the "frat bro" stereotype, including characteristics such as being college-aged, in a fraternity, hedonistic, crude, obnoxious, North American, group-oriented, and enjoying partying, the gym, sports, and hooking up. In addition, fragrance becomes an interest primarily to enhance seduction and their ability to pick up attractive college-aged women. They purchase fragrances based on three main criteria: maximum projection and longevity, whether women like it, and the compliment factor. Fragrances such as Sauvage, Eros, One Million, Invictus, Bad Boy, and Aventus are commonly associated with the "Fragrance Bro".

The "Fragrance Bro" stereotype is not always accurate or visible, and it is worth noting that the reality of the "bro" culture is quite different. The term "bro" has evolved over time to include a range of connotations, from a close guy friend to a trustworthy and faithful person. While it can have negative connotations, such as blindly masculine or guilt-free for any action, it can also have positive associations, such as dependable or mildly heroic.

The "Fragrance Bro" stereotype is often associated with amateur fragrance reviewers on YouTube, who may lack experience and expertise. These reviewers share their opinions on fragrances, which may vary from others' opinions, and their reviews may be influenced by companies sending them bottles. It is important to note that anyone can start reviewing fragrances on YouTube, and these reviews may not always provide honest or accurate information.

Overall, the "Fragrance Bro" stereotype represents a specific type of person within the fragrance community, and while it may have some negative connotations, it is important to recognize that the term "bro" can have a broader range of meanings and that not all individuals who identify as "bros" fit the exact same mold.

Bro-culture and brand loyalty

The term "fragrance bro" or "frag bro" is used to refer to a member of the online fragrance community, particularly on YouTube, Reddit, and other social media platforms. This community is often described as having a "bro-culture" or "bro-science" dynamic, which can be positive or negative depending on the context.

Bro-culture in the fragrance community can be likened to an exclusive club, with members displaying fierce loyalty to certain brands and fragrances. Some of the brands that have gained a significant following within this culture include Xerjoff, Hugo Boss, Christian Dior, Creed, Thierry Mugler, Tom Ford, Bvlgari, Bond No. 9, and Yves Saint Laurent. Niche houses like Nasomatto and Sospiro have also made their way into the bro-culture fragrance scene.

The Fragrance Bros, in particular, are known for their strong brand loyalty, as seen in their dedication to specific fragrances like Creed's Aventus. This loyalty can be observed in their willingness to invest in expensive perfumes, such as a group of bros chipping in to buy a 30ml Aventus to showcase their taste in fragrances.

This dynamic has sparked some controversy within the fragrance community, with some accusing popular reviewers like Jeremy Fragrance of being sponsored by fragrance companies or paying for subscribers. While Jeremy has denied these accusations, the drama has led to discussions about the integrity of reviews and the importance of honest opinions in the community.

The fragrance bro-culture has also been associated with a focus on the performance and attractiveness of perfumes. Members of this culture often base their purchases on factors such as projection, longevity, and the perceived appeal to women. This has led to a perception of the fragrance bro-culture as cringe or overly intense, with some critics mocking the idea that a particular fragrance will automatically make women attracted to them.

Despite the criticism, the fragrance bro-culture has broadened the field of fragrances, bringing more enthusiasm and interest to the hobby. It has encouraged the sharing of anecdotes and experiences, creating a large sample size of data that can be useful in sorting out fact from fiction. This dynamic has also contributed to the rise of indie perfume collections and a more diverse range of fragrances.

The Aventus batches debate

Aventus is a fragrance by Creed that has been described as smelling like pineapple and leather. There is an ongoing debate about Aventus batches, with some people believing that certain batches are superior to others. This belief has led to a sub-community of Aventus-specific-batch-hunters, who seek out particular batches that are believed to have a better scent or performance. Some batches are reported to be woodier, smokier, or fruitier, and these variations in the makeup of the fragrance have sparked endless debates among fragrance enthusiasts.

The debate surrounding Aventus batches centres around a few key issues. Firstly, there is the question of whether the older batches are better than the newer ones. Some people argue that the quality of Aventus has degraded over time, particularly since 2017-2018 when Creed was bought by LVMH, a huge conglomerate. It is believed that the staying power, complexity, and quality of ingredients have diminished during this period. However, others disagree, stating that they have not noticed a significant difference between older and newer batches.

Secondly, there is the issue of batch consistency. Some people claim that certain batches are more consistent in terms of scent and performance, while others report variations even within the same batch. It is speculated that differences in specific oils and ingredients used, due to their natural origins, may contribute to inconsistencies between batches.

Lastly, the Aventus batch debate also involves the discussion of "bad" or "weak" batches. Some people have expressed frustration with certain batches that are considered less desirable, either due to a stronger smoky scent or weaker performance. However, it is suggested that these "bad" batches can be improved or enhanced by combining them with other fragrances or oils to create a more favourable scent.

The Aventus batch debate highlights the complexities and nuances in the world of fragrances. While some people seek out specific batches believed to be superior, others experiment with enhancing their less favourable batches. This ongoing discussion reflects the subjective nature of scent perception and the importance placed on fragrance performance and quality within the community.

Amateur fragrance reviewers

While some may find these reviewers entertaining, others have criticised them for their lack of professionalism and the potential bias in their reviews. For example, some reviewers have been accused of being sponsored by fragrance companies or of having paid subscribers, which calls into question the impartiality of their recommendations. This has led to discussions within the fragrance community about the role and responsibility of amateur reviewers, with some arguing that honest reviews are essential given the high cost of fragrances.

The "frag bro" culture has also been associated with brand loyalty, with certain niche perfume houses gaining a dedicated following among this group. This loyalty can sometimes border on exclusivity, with those who do not share the same preferences being looked down upon. The community has also been described as having a "bro-science" approach to fragrances, focusing on practical considerations such as ingredients and batch differences rather than more abstract or florid descriptions.

Despite the criticisms, the popularity of amateur fragrance reviewers like Fragrance Bros highlights a growing interest in perfumery among young men. This trend has been fuelled by online platforms like YouTube, which have provided a space for enthusiasts to connect and share their passions. While some may disagree with the methods and motivations of these amateur reviewers, their impact on the fragrance community cannot be denied.

Frequently asked questions