Perfumes And Colognes: Gender Stereotypes Or Something Else?

The idea that perfume is for women and cologne is for men is a common misconception. While it is true that, in practice, these terms are often used to refer to fragrances marketed towards a particular gender, the distinction is not an inherent part of their definitions. In fact, the difference between perfume and cologne is based on the concentration of oils in the fragrance, with cologne containing less oil and more water and alcohol than perfume.

The gendered marketing of fragrances is a relatively recent trend, with historical figures such as Napoleon and Louis XIV bucking the modern convention by wearing what would today be considered feminine fragrances.

Fragrance is about concentration, not gender

The idea that perfume is for women and cologne is for men is a common misconception. While it is true that, generally, perfume is marketed towards women and cologne towards men, the difference between the two is not based on gender. Instead, it is based on the concentration of oils in the fragrance.

The History of Fragrance

The history of perfumery dates back to ancient times. Originally, fragrant products from plants (such as wood, roots, mosses, and flowers) were used in the same way by men and women. They served to deodorize and protect against diseases, which were thought to be conveyed by bad smells.

The Difference Between Perfume and Cologne

The difference between perfume and cologne is based on how the fragrances are formulated and the concentration or amount of oils in the fragrance. Cologne, which was created in Germany in the 18th century, is the most diluted type of fragrance, with the least amount of fragrance oil in the formula (usually around 2 to 4%) and more alcohol and water. Perfume, on the other hand, has the highest concentration of fragrance oil, at about 20 to 30%.

Marketing and Gender Stereotypes

The sexualization of perfume and the association of certain fragrances with specific genders is a relatively recent trend. It stems from the hygienism that invaded Europe in the late 19th century and was later accentuated by the rise of American marketing in the 1950s. Today, fragrances are often created based on a social and economic profile, and the talent and creativity of perfumers must succeed in consumer tests. The brand, packaging, and advertising subtly guide our choices according to our gender.

Breaking Down Gender Stereotypes

Fortunately, the boundaries between genders are starting to crumble, and androgynous or unisex trends are becoming more valued and affirmed. Unisex fragrances started to appear in the 1990s, thanks to designers like Calvin Klein and his iconic CK One perfume for women and men. Today, noses are becoming more educated, and mindsets are changing. People are realizing that fragrance is subjective and that only your feeling matters when choosing a scent. So, keep your ideas and nose open and indulge in the fragrances that you enjoy!

Gendered marketing is a recent trend

The sexualization of perfume stems from the hygienism that invaded Europe in the late nineteenth century. During the previous century, men of high society did not fear a lack of virility by perfuming themselves with flowery fragrances. The rise of American marketing in the 1950s accentuated the gender distinction, persuading consumers that a perfume must be for a man or a woman.

In today's social climate, it seems unlikely that people would stand for such egregious stereotyping in advertising. However, products like dish soap and cars are still aimed at consumers based on gender demographics. Brands are just subtler in their approach. For instance, a sports equipment company might only portray men in its commercials.

Stereotypes suggest that a person's gender has a bearing on their personality, cognition, and leadership abilities. However, research from the American Psychological Association finds that this is not the case. A consumer might identify as a woman, but she could also be interested in sports or enjoy hiking and camping. A man might be interested in cars, but he might also do the grocery shopping for his children.

Brands have caught themselves and consumers in a vicious cycle. Stereotypes trap people into thinking that they are meant to desire a certain product, and then brands market that product toward the gender that has typically bought it. As a result, companies have convinced women to spend more on products that are nearly identical to those marketed to men, a phenomenon called the "pink tax".

However, this trend is changing. As modern consumers, particularly those of younger generations, seek brand experiences that are inclusive of all gender identities, brands are beginning to embrace neutrality. For example, in 2017, Target partnered with Toca Boca to debut a back-to-school line of clothing, accessories, backpacks, and bedding intended to appeal to boys and girls alike.

In the perfume industry, a change is also happening. At her fragrance studio in New York City, Sue Phillips, a fragrance expert and founder of Scenterprises, sees men growing more comfortable using the word "perfume". She believes that the reason for this shift is the current generation's obsession with self-expression and reluctance to care about labels.

In conclusion, while gendered marketing has been a prevalent strategy, it is a relatively recent trend that is now evolving towards more inclusivity and neutrality.

Unisex fragrances are becoming more popular

Unisex fragrances are becoming increasingly popular as gender norms continue to evolve, challenging the traditional view that perfume is for women and cologne is for men. This shift can be attributed to a growing acceptance of fluidity in fashion, cosmetics, and fragrance choices, reflecting a desire for more openness in self-expression and individuality.

The distinction between fragrances for men and women is a relatively recent trend, influenced by cultural and marketing factors. Historically, fragrant products from plants were used by both men and women for deodorizing and protection against diseases. The sexualization of perfume emerged in the late 19th century, and American marketing in the 1950s further accentuated this gender distinction. However, in many parts of the world, such as the Middle East, men and women still use the same opulent and heady floral essences.

The rise of gender fluidity, particularly among younger generations, has led to the emergence of unisex fragrances. Fragrance brands are recognizing this shift by creating scents that don't specify a gender, such as Byredo. While the gender categories will likely persist as a familiar way to shop for fragrances, there is an increasing crossover, with fragrances containing traditionally feminine notes in masculine scents and vice versa. For example, orange blossom and lily-of-the-valley are common in men's aftershaves, while woody notes, once associated with men's colognes, are now trending in both the male and female markets.

Additionally, the fashion industry's influence cannot be understated, with women embracing male products, such as boyfriend blazers or oversized t-shirts. This trend has extended to fragrances, with fresh and zesty scents, like those from Acqua di Parma, appealing to both men and women.

The growing popularity of unisex fragrances also reflects a change in consumer mindset. Fragrances are powerful tools for expressing personality and style, evoking emotions, and triggering memories. Consumers are increasingly basing their choices on the scent itself rather than the gender it is advertised for. This shift is evident in the success of fragrances like Jo Malone's basil and neroli or wood sage and sea salt combinations, Tom Ford's Black Orchid, and Penhaligon's Blasted Bloom.

In conclusion, the rise of unisex fragrances signifies a move towards greater gender fluidity and individuality in fragrance choices. Consumers are embracing scents that transcend traditional gender boundaries, reflecting a desire for self-expression and a more personalized connection to their fragrances.

The same fragrances are used by both genders in some places

The perception that perfume is for women and cologne is for men is a stereotype that has been perpetuated by marketing strategies. While it is true that certain scents are marketed specifically towards men or women, the chemical composition of fragrances does not inherently differ by gender. The distinction between "masculine" and "feminine" fragrances is a recent trend, and in many places and cultures, the same fragrances are used by both genders.

Historically, fragrant products from plants, such as wood, roots, mosses, and flowers, were used by both men and women. These products served as deodorants and were also believed to protect against diseases, which were thought to be conveyed by bad smells. Even pets, such as horses, were perfumed. Over time, perfume became associated with wealth and social status, and individuals of all genders would use fragrance to display their rank. For example, Louis XIV was known to wear orange blossom, while the Empress Eugenie favoured Eau de Cologne.

The sexualization of perfume and the association of specific fragrances with particular genders can be traced back to the rise of hygienism in Europe during the late nineteenth century. This trend was further accentuated by American marketing in the 1950s, which emphasized the gender distinction in fragrance advertising. However, this gendered perception of fragrance is not universal and is largely influenced by cultural factors.

In the Maghreb, Polynesia, India, and the Middle East, men and women often use the same fragrances, which may be flowery, opulent, and heady essences. For example, Guerlain's Shalimar perfume is particularly popular among men in the Middle East. Similarly, in Brazil, women are known to favour lavender, a scent that is typically associated with masculinity in Western cultures. These examples illustrate how the perception of fragrance as gendered is a social construct that varies across different cultures and time periods.

Today, the boundaries between genders are becoming increasingly blurred, and this is reflected in the fragrance industry. The first unisex fragrances were introduced in the 1990s by designer Calvin Klein, who created the iconic CK One for both women and men. Since then, more and more androgynous and unisex fragrances are being created, challenging the traditional gender dichotomy in perfumery. Fragrance companies such as Calvin Klein and Chanel are now championing fragrances that are suitable for all genders, recognizing that individuals may prefer scents that do not conform to traditional gender norms.

Gendered fragrances are based on cultural perceptions

The distinction between perfume for men and women is a very recent trend. In ancient times, fragrant products from plants were used by all, regardless of gender, to deodorise and protect against diseases, which were thought to be conveyed by bad smells. Perfume was also used to signal wealth and social rank. For example, Louis XIV was known to wear orange blossom, and Napoleon wore an excess of perfume to cover his body odour after months spent on the field.

The sexualisation of perfume and the gendering of fragrances emerged in the 19th century, with the rise of hygienism in Europe and the emergence of a new middle class. Gender roles became more distinct, with the man going to the office and the woman staying at home. Perfume companies capitalised on these stereotypes, targeting women with delicate floral fragrances in elegant, curved bottles, and marketing perfumes for men with virile imagery and aromatic, spicy scents.

However, these gendered fragrance associations are based on cultural perceptions, which vary across the world. In the Middle East, men often wear floral fragrances, and in Brazil, women tend to prefer fresher, greener fragrances. In India, jasmine, traditionally considered feminine, is used by people of all genders to scent their homes and as temple offerings.

The rigid gender distinctions in the Western fragrance industry are beginning to break down, with the rise of unisex fragrances and niche perfumes that reject gendered marketing. This shift can be attributed to younger fragrance enthusiasts who are more open to trying new things and are less concerned with rigid gender norms.

Frequently asked questions