Colognes And Bacteria: An Unlikely Combination?

The use of cologne as a disinfectant has been a topic of discussion, especially during the recent pandemic. While cologne often contains more than 60% ethyl alcohol, which is a known disinfectant, it is not advisable to use cologne as a disinfectant for the skin or wounds. This is because the alcohol can damage tissues and delay the healing process. Cologne also contains oils which may serve as a growth culture for microorganisms, leading to potential infections. Furthermore, cologne is not always effective against certain viruses and bacteria, and the amount required to disinfect surfaces may not be cost-effective. Overall, while cologne contains disinfectant properties due to its alcohol content, it is not recommended as a substitute for traditional disinfectants or hand sanitizers.

Cologne can disinfect non-critical items such as table-tops and metal surfaces

Cologne can be used to disinfect non-critical items such as table-tops and metal surfaces. This is because cologne contains more than 60% ethyl alcohol, which is a known disinfectant with virucidal and bactericidal properties.

The use of cologne as a disinfectant became more common during the pandemic when access to traditional disinfectants was limited. However, it is important to note that cologne should not be used on open wounds or mucous membranes as it can cause a burning sensation and damage tissues, delaying the healing process.

While cologne can be effective in killing common forms of bacteria, it is not suitable for sterilisation. This is because certain viruses, such as the polio-virus and hepatitis A virus, are immune to ethyl alcohol.

Additionally, the cost of cologne may be prohibitive when used as a disinfectant, and it may not be as accessible or cost-effective as traditional soap and water. Furthermore, cologne often contains oils, which can leave a residue on surfaces and cause skin irritation with excessive use.

Overall, while cologne can be used to disinfect non-critical items such as table-tops and metal surfaces, it is important to consider its limitations and potential side effects.

Cologne is not suitable for use on open skin, wounds or mucous membranes

It is important to note that cologne should not be used on open skin, wounds, or mucous membranes. While cologne can be used as a disinfectant, it is not suitable for use on these areas due to the following reasons:

Firstly, applying cologne on open skin or wounds can cause a severe burning sensation or heat. The ethyl alcohol present in cologne will damage the tissues on the open wound or skin cuts, delaying the natural healing process. The research study published in the American Journal of Physiology concluded that ethanol exposure impairs angiogenesis and the proliferative phase of wound healing. "Angiogenesis" refers to the development of new blood vessels, while the "proliferative phase of wound healing" is the process of rebuilding or recovering the wound.

Secondly, cologne contains not only ethyl alcohol but also other perfume oils and essential oils. Even if the ethyl alcohol kills the microorganisms on the wound, it will evaporate, leaving traces of perfume oil behind. This can serve as a perfect growth culture for microorganisms, increasing the risk of infection.

Lastly, using cologne on wounds or cuts can lead to an extreme burning sensation and pain. Therefore, it is essential to avoid cologne if you have cuts or burns, especially on the upper body area.

In summary, while cologne can be used as a disinfectant for non-critical items, it should not be used on open skin, wounds, or mucous membranes due to the potential risks of tissue damage, infection, and discomfort.

Cologne is not suitable for sterilisation

While cologne can be used to disinfect non-critical items such as table-tops, metal, or other external surfaces, it is not suitable for sterilisation. Sterilisation is a process that eliminates all microorganisms, including bacterial spores, and cologne does not have this capability.

Firstly, cologne should not be used for sterilisation as it can be harmful to the user. The high concentration of alcohol in cologne, typically over 60%, can damage the skin and cause a severe burning sensation or heat on open wounds. This can delay the natural healing process.

Secondly, cologne is not a broad-spectrum disinfectant, meaning it does not act against a wide range of microbes. Certain viruses, such as hepatitis A and polio, are immune to ethyl alcohol, the primary disinfectant in cologne. Therefore, using cologne for sterilisation may not be effective against all types of microorganisms.

Thirdly, cologne does not have a residual effect on treated surfaces. It does not leave an antimicrobial film on surfaces, which is a crucial aspect of sterilisation to prevent future microbial growth.

Furthermore, cologne is not always environmentally friendly and can damage certain surfaces. It may corrode metallic surfaces or cause the deterioration of cloth, rubber, plastic, or other commonly used materials. This limitation makes it unsuitable for sterilising medical equipment or other delicate items.

Lastly, cologne is not a cost-effective solution for sterilisation. The amount of cologne needed to disinfect an object or surface would be much higher than other disinfectant options, and the emotional connection to a favourite cologne may make it challenging to use for this purpose.

In conclusion, while cologne can be used for general disinfection of non-critical items, it is not suitable for sterilisation due to its limitations in effectiveness, user safety, surface compatibility, and cost.

Cologne is not a cost-effective disinfectant

Colognes are often alcohol-based and contain more than 60% ethyl alcohol, which is a known disinfectant with bactericidal properties. However, cologne is not a cost-effective disinfectant for several reasons.

Firstly, colognes are not designed to be disinfectants and do not meet the criteria for an ideal disinfectant as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). While cologne can be effective against some common bacteria and viruses, it is not broad-spectrum enough to act against a wide range of microbes. Additionally, cologne may not be compatible with soaps and detergents, and its effectiveness may be reduced in the presence of organic matter such as blood or other body excretions.

Secondly, cologne is not a cost-effective option for disinfection due to its high price. A single piece of clothing would require a significant amount of cologne, making it an expensive choice for disinfection. Water and soap or detergent are more accessible and affordable options that are just as effective.

Thirdly, cologne should not be used on open wounds or mucous membranes as it can cause severe burning and damage the tissues, delaying the healing process. This limits its use as a disinfectant, especially on the skin.

Furthermore, cologne is not environmentally friendly and can pose risks to the environment upon disposal. It also contains harmful toxins that can be dangerous to human health, such as phthalates, which have been linked to various health issues, including cancer, respiratory problems, and reproductive and developmental toxicity.

Lastly, cologne is not a stable disinfectant and may not be effective in concentrate or diluted form. It is important to note that cologne is not regulated or safety-tested by external bodies, and its effectiveness as a disinfectant may vary.

In conclusion, while cologne may have some disinfectant properties due to its alcohol content, it is not a cost-effective or recommended option for disinfection. It is important to consider the limitations and potential risks associated with using cologne as a disinfectant and opt for more suitable and affordable alternatives.

Cologne can be used as a hand sanitiser, but it is not cost-effective

While cologne can technically be used as hand sanitiser, it is not cost-effective.

According to Consumer Reports, fragrance formulations containing 70% or more alcohol are effective against bacteria. Commercial fragrances, such as Eau de Toilettes and Eau de Colognes, generally contain at least that amount, making them just as safe and effective as hand sanitisers. However, cologne is not an ideal substitute for hand sanitiser as it is not designed for this purpose and may be more expensive.

The price of isopropyl alcohol, a key ingredient in hand gels and wipes, has spiked due to supply and demand. This has made hand sanitiser products more expensive. However, cologne is even more costly. For example, Turkish cologne, which contains 80% alcohol, is effective as a hand sanitiser but is likely to be more expensive than a standard hand sanitiser product.

Furthermore, cologne is not as effective as hand sanitiser because it does not contain water. Commercial hand sanitisers contain between 60-70% alcohol, either in water or aloe vera gel (which is mostly water). The water in these products is essential because, at higher concentrations of alcohol, the outermost proteins of the cell are coagulated, "sealing" the cell and preventing water from entering and killing the cell. Therefore, cologne is not as effective as a hand sanitiser because it does not have the same ratio of alcohol to water.

In addition, even properly made commercial hand sanitisers are much less effective than regular hand-washing with soap and water. Hand sanitisers should only be used as a temporary measure when soap and water are not available.

Therefore, while cologne can technically be used as a hand sanitiser due to its high alcohol content, it is not cost-effective, and there are more effective and affordable options available.

Frequently asked questions